As the world shifts to renewable energy and fossil fuel industries close down, what will happen to the local workforce, communities and businesses that depend on them?

This week, at the global climate summit in Glasgow, business, government, and civil society leaders discussed how a “just transition” can help address the social challenges ahead. The term “just transition” is about prioritising decent work and quality jobs for displaced workers as coal mines, oil refineries, power plants and more, are rapidly phased out.

But, as we explain in our recent research paper, the idea of a just transition needs to expand. Many new mines will be required to meet demand for minerals used in clean energy infrastructure. And these mines may come with enormous impacts, including new forms of inequality, social exclusion, and impacts on land and natural resources.

If we fail to balance the social impacts of climate change with responsible climate action, we risk substituting one kind of harm for another – and this would be a disaster of another kind.

Language: English

Publisher: The Conversation

Region: Global

Type: Article

CITATION

Kemp, D., & Bainton, N. (n.d.). More clean energy means more mines – we shouldn’t sacrifice communities in the name of climate action. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/more-clean-energy-means-more-mines-we-shouldnt-sacrifice-communities-in-the-name-of-climate-action-170938

Share this page

More clean energy means more mines – we shouldn’t sacrifice communities in the name of climate action
0

More clean energy means more mines – we shouldn’t sacrifice communities in the name of climate action